Please select your reason for flagging this blog as inappropriate from the dropdown below. We promise to review each and every submission within 1-2 business days.
Hybrid CarsHybrid cars, hybrid trucks and hybrid SUVs, including plug-in hybrid vehicles, plus a hybrid vehicle buyers club. Check out the HybridCarBlog for information on the costs of hybrid cars, the fuel efficiency of hybrid cars and much more. If it is about hybrid cars or plug-in hybrid vehicles, then we cover it.
Over the years I've heard many say they won't buy another car until it comes with a plug. Well, for most Americans, they'll be waiting a long time for a new car, especially if they want a pure electric vehicle.
In a new article today, Ron Cogan asks, "Will buyers pay $15,000 to $25,000 more for a vehicle that runs solely on batteries compared to a similar gasoline or clean diesel model?"
Of course not, which is why conventional vehicles and hybrid cars, including plug-in hybrids, will be the dominant automotive technologies for the short-to-midterm, or even longer.
And analysis by Bosch Automotive Group suggests the same. "The electric car will come, but in small numbers at first. It will occupy a niche and will not make a noticeable mark on the roads until after 2020." Ultimately, "dominance of the internal-combustion engine will remain unchallenged over the next twenty years."
Is the government's focus on plugging in too much too soon? Shouldn't the focus be on getting batteries, especially next gen batteries, into as many cars as soon as possible, rather than just those with plugs? Can America really afford to give the cheap hybrid vehicle market away to the Asians the same way we gave away small cars just a few decades ago? Even worse, might this focus on the plug be counter-productive to developing an American battery manufacturing industry?
By the second half of 2010 GM should begin rolling out a few new hybrids with its upgraded BAS mild hybrid system. And the lithium-ion batteries for these new hybrids will be powered by Hitachi.
Today, Hitachi announced that it is planning to significantly increase production of its lithium ion batteries in advance of an expected significant increase in demand. So far, GM alone has already ordered enough cells for 100,000 hybrid vehicles.
Not that long ago, but before the gas price boom of 2008, GM's Bob Lutz stated that GM could have used a fraction of one year's marketing budget to produce a Toyota Prius competitor. Instead, GM invested that money into ads promoting its latest round of gas guzzlers as Toyota went onto sell more than 1,000,000 Prius hybrids and counting.
Today, GM's largest shareholder is the government, via the US taxpayer, and the government has vowed to put $50 billion more into the new GM beyond the many billions it put into GM to save the automaker from bankruptcy. Hopefully, this time, GM is smarter about the way it spends money.
But, if the new GM is like the new GMAC, also known as Ally Bank, I think it might be time for liquidation.
The new Ally Bank commercials portray Ally Bank as this fair, new bank, unlike all the other banks that screwed over customers and then needed massive bailout money. Unfortunately, however, Ally Bank is GMAC, the same financial unit of GM that received some $20 billion from the US government to keep the doors open.
This is the kind of of company - the kind of ethics - that the government is going to invest, ultimately, almost $100 billion into?
Sales of Ford hybrid cars were up 91 percent in June compared to last June, largely thanks to the new Fusion hybrid. Then again, last year at this time, supplies of the Escape hybrid were so low that I'm not quite sure this number is as impressive as it sounds.
Overall in June, Ford sold 3,649 hybrid vehicles. For comparison, Toyota sold 16,744 hybrids.
Without doubt, this is a nice improvement for Ford's hybrid sales. Nonetheless, until Ford takes on the Prius, Ford will remain a minor hybrid player compared to Toyota.
An optional, upgraded head lamp has been faulty and potential class action lawsuits are in the works. Yet, from what I've been able to determine, this is a problem affecting only hundreds of Prius owners. Perhaps many others aren't complaining, and this problem is affecting a couple thousand owners. Nonetheless, we're talking a tiny faction of Toyota Prius owners.
Certainly, if this is a shoddy product, Toyota should recall and fix this problem. Regardless, is this something that could really hurt Prius sales, or is this just something that MotorTrend and AutoWeek are hoping will hurt Prius sales?
OK. GM has crushed the idea of using Toyota's hybrid technology numerous times. Nonetheless, there is another rumor out today that Toyota and GM are discussing the possibility of re-utilizing their joint NUMMI venture to rebadge Toyota Prius hybrids for GM.
Regardless of the fact that I'm 99.9 percent certain such a partnership would never happen, what would GM have to gain by such a venture?
Almost certainly, GM wouldn't make any money off these hybrid vehicles, and I don't think they would provide any more green PR than the Chevy Volt is already providing. Even worse, these cars would cast much doubt on GM's upcoming lithium-powered BAS hybrid powertrain.
Am I missing something? Why won't this rumor just go away?
I have not yet seen the August issue of Consumer Reports, but according to CNN, CR will not recommend the Honda Insight, noting its poor "ride quality, handling, interior noise, acceleration, and rear-seat access."
In fact, out of 22 hatchbacks and small wagons, the Insight placed second to last.
Honda countered by saying initial consumer feedback and auto media press has been much more favorable regarding Honda's latest hybrid.
Yet, Dow is seeking a Department of Energy grant to "demonstrate the technology at a level to sufficiently prove that it can be implemented on a commercial scale". Read: Profitable.
Fine. I can handle the fact that Dow, a company that has made billions in profit over the years, needs my help to investigate the next big green development. Still, why is it that whenever Dow hits the next big breakthrough - using my money - the politicians get rewarded, Dow stock holders get paid, but I don't?
What investor would ever agree to such an investment?
And it's not just Dow. It's many major companies. It's certainly GM, GMAC, Citi, Chrysler, AIG, etc, etc, etc. Aren't such companies forever indebted to the tax payers, to the people? Is it not we, the people, that are the real investors, not the government?
Despite an uptick in recent US diesel vehicle sales, probably thanks to a significant drop in diesel fuel prices, Honda, Chrysler, Ford, General Motors, Nissan and Toyota have "halted diesel programs because of spiraling costs and other problems," according to AutoWeek.
Toyota followed up this news with the comment that they are "banking heavily" on gasoline-powered hybrid vehicles.
Otherwise guzzlers will still be America's top sellers
If gas prices hit $4.00 today, what would happen?
According to a survey by Cars.com, 40 percent of car shoppers would immediately buy a more fuel efficient vehicle today. Another 41 percent would buy a more fuel efficient vehicle when they were ready to buy another auto.
However, if gas were $3.75, instead of $4.00, only 29 percent would buy a more fuel efficient vehicle.
Even more noteworthy, at $2.50 - 2.75, 64 percent of new car shoppers won't even consider a more fuel efficient vehicle.
I guess it's not really that surprising that US automakers are still dragging their feet on cheap hybrid cars, or even a real push towards hybridizing their truck fleets. Without much higher gas prices, Americans just aren't that interested.
As the House quickly tweaks 1200 pages of cap and trade legislation, cutting chunks of it, unfortunately, into large slices of pork, I cannot help but wonder how much cap and trade will affect foreign oil dependency.
A couple months ago USAToday published research that suggested that by 2015 cap & trade would add between .16 cents on the low end to $2.58 on the high end to the price of a gallon of gas.
That's a lot of variability. If cap and trade only results in an extra .16 cents at the pump, it seems hard to believe that cap and trade's affect on gas prices would have much impact on foreign oil dependency. Of course, if the high end becomes reality, we'll significantly reduce foreign oil dependency, but we'll also kill the US auto industry.
Is cap and trade the right approach to foreign oil dependency? Is foreign oil dependency irrelevant compared to global warming?
I'm a big fan of the Chevy Volt. I've been talking about it for more than 2 years. Unfortunately, I'll be talking about if for more than another year before GM actually starts selling this innovative plug-in vehicle.
Anyway, today GM announced that it had started production on pre-production Volts, slightly ahead of schedule. Yet, what does this really mean?
Despite the long term potential of the Chevy Volt, the Volt offers GM very little in the next decade, other than positive press. In fact, it will almost certainly be at least a decade before GM is even producing 100,000 Volts per year. In the short term, Volt sales are meaningless. It's all about marketing.
Certainly, in another decade or so, the Volt could become GM's most important vehicle, or at least the first output of its most important platform. Unfortunately, however, it is far too early to tell. Every automaker has various plug-in plans, but the winners are many years away from being determined. Yet, no other plug-in vehicle receives near the attention of the Volt.
Regardless, there is no denying the marketing power of the Volt. Hence, is the Volt the greatest marketing coup ever in the automotive world?
Will consumers buy expensive coal powered plug-in vehicles?
The Government Accounting Agency (GAO) has completed its research on the benefits of plug-in vehicles, availability and challenges of incorporating plug-in vehicles into the federal fleet according to GreenCarCongress. While the report found that plug-in vehicles offer much potential, it also found lots of problems.
For instance America must either embrace nuclear or wide scale renewable power projects in order for plug-ins to reach their potential. Of course, each of these paths offers its own set of extensive problems, such as costs, public approval, etc. Moreover, significant cuts in battery costs, coupled with much higher gas prices, and a more robust auto demand, for instance, will be required to create enough demand for plug-ins to keep the technology moving forward.
Ultimately, the GAO report suggests that wide scale plug-in adoption, even at the Federal level, is going to be a complex process. More than anything, at least in my opinion, the report seems to imply that wide scale plug-in adoption might be much further into the future then many of us would like to believe.
Certainly, US automakers need to continue, even increase, their plug-in efforts, but isn't it becoming more and more obvious that US automakers need to completely reconsider their short-to-midterm auto production plans? For example, can the US auto industry continue to move forward without a direct competitor - in terms of cost and technology - to the Toyota Prius?
GM has been talking about a big increase in it's hybrid vehicle portfolio for a number of years now. Today, GM reiterated those plans of 14 new hybrid vehicles by 2012.
Since that statement, MotorTrend has tried to guess GM's future hybrid line up. Sadly, outside of the Chevy Volt, not much looks that impressive. Hopefully, 14 different models, some rebadged, will collectively help GM move some hybrids and provide some scalability for these technologies.
Ultimately, however, there are still some key questions. First, can an updated BAS System with lithium really make GM's mild hybrids that much more compelling? Second, will the dual mode hybrid powertrain ever be cost-effective, especially in smaller SUVs and crossovers that might not need all the functionality that the dual mode hybrid powertrain provides?
Regardless, I'd prefer just one or two new hybrid models, each capable of selling at least 50,000 units per year, instead of 7 more that each sell 10,000 units, or less, per year. Thus, I'm hoping, possibly beyond hope, that GM has at least one hybrid wild card up its sleeve.
Hybrid cars probably won't become major players in Europe until they are offered in diesel versions. Nonetheless, three hybrids are up for the 2010 Car of the Year in Europe. The new third generation Toyota Prius, Lexus RX450h, and Honda Insight were all given a nod in Europe this year.
The other day a new University of Michigan study found that US automakers have perpetually underestimated the importance of fuel efficiency in the American market. However, a robust change towards fuel efficiency could be a huge cash cow for US automakers.
But are US automakers making the right moves?
America's most notable future product, in terms of fuel efficiency, is the Chevy Volt. Yet, the Volt's most important piece of technology, the lithium battery, is based on South Korea's LG Chem chemistry. Interestingly, LG Chem is also developing the cells to power Hyundai hybrids, another Korean company. Yet, if Hyundai has perfected the lithium polymer battery, Hyundai's battery technology might already be superior to GM's.
And what of smaller, cheaper cars and hybrids?
Again, there is Hyundai, but also BYD, Mahindra, Tata, and many other emerging automakers that could become very competitive within the next decade. And, many of these automakers - which have far cheaper labor costs - are building their entire business models on cheap, small vehicles and alternative technologies.
Moreover, like Hyundai, BYD has a hometown lithium cell provider, itself. BYD also has far easier access to lithium than does any US company.
Ultimately, I'm certainly not arguing that US automakers cannot compete, especially Ford. However, it seems US automakers need to think far beyond CAFE. If US automakers are to be successful a decade from now, don't they have to raise and lead the fuel efficiency bar across all automotive segments?
For a few years Toyota has been toying around with the idea of a US plant to manufacture its red hot Toyota Prius. Unfortunately, the current recession crushed any such plan for the short term.
Would it be wise for the US government to help bring such a plant to the US, or should the government only protect US companies, or only just UAW workers?
Likewise, Nissan is now planning a US plant for electric vehicle and electric vehicle battery development, with a significant eye on US government help. Should they get it?
Are incentives for transplants to bring more manufacturing jobs to the US a good or bad idea?
Aside from economic recession, fluctuating gas prices are also contributing to the decline in US auto sales, according to Hyundai's top US executive. Because consumers don't know whether gas prices are going much higher, or possibly much lower, John Krafcik told the AP that many consumers are left feeling paralyzed. Quite simply they are afraid to buy the wrong vehicle.
Thus, Krafcik suggested a flexible gas tax to help stabilize gas prices by putting a bottom on the price of gas.
At a shareholder meeting yesterday Toyota vice president Masatami Takimoto told attendees that Toyota would increase its line of hybrid cars, in addition to cost-cutting, to return the company back to profitability.
Likewise, when asked about zero emission vehicles, Takimoto stated that Toyota would begin selling new fuel cell cars in 2015 as part of its plan to stay ahead of the green vehicle pack.
Hyundai has yet to sell a hybrid in the US, and it's first hybrid will be the Sonata hybrid. Without a unique hybrid, can Hyundai really compete in the hybrid cars segment?
Certainly, Hyundai's debut of its Blue Drive Hybrid system at the LA Auto Show - featuring lithium polymer batteries - was extremely compelling. Still, how much will this technology cost, and without a unique hybrid offering, does lithium polymer matter?
I'm not sure, but after today's impressive jump in vehicle quality by Hyundai, I can't help but wonder if Hyundai isn't ready to kick up its entire operation a notch - an operation significantly focused on fuel economy. Hyundai has made numerous forward looking statements on CAFE, hybrids, etc. in recent years, but has this all been just talk - typical auto industry PR - or has Hyundai been preparing for this walk all along?
Hyundai might just now be finding its stride, and if Hyundai has also mastered the lithium polymer battery for hybrid cars.......well, you ain't seen nothing yet.
I don't hate GM. Still, now that US taxpayers are into GM for many tens of billions of dollars, it's hard not to look at GM in anything other than a critical light. And, unfortunately, it's very easy to find criticism with GM.
Last week a JD Power supplier survey found that of the top 10 automakers, GM was considered to be the least innovative. Then, today a UM study claimed that GM is not prepared for a significant move towards fuel efficiency.
So, what does GM have for the future? Well, it has the Chevy Volt, a very compelling vehicle, but a vehicle that GM will only be producing 77,000 units of per year by 2015. How can that really help GM become more fuel efficient and competitive?
It's all about marketing. Aside from the CAFE credits that the Volt will provide for GM's guzzlers, the real purpose of the Volt for the next decade is about image, not profitability. The Volt is an "image-changer" that will help change GM's image as an automaker lacking innovation into an innovator, without actually selling lots of innovative vehicles, noted an IBD article this weekend.
Hopefully, one day GM's auto business will be as innovative as its marketing.
The University of Michigan released a new study today suggesting that fuel efficiency isn't the big burden many have proclaimed it to be for automakers. Instead, pent up demand for fuel efficiency will result in strong demand for such vehicles.
Unfortunately, however, the report also notes that GM is the least prepared for a move towards fuel efficiency. And while some have suggested relaxed CAFE standards for GM and Chrysler as they emerge from bankruptcy, the report claims such a move would only make GM less competitive into the future.
Alright. I'm not a big fan of the cash for clunker program that has now passed Congress. Anyway, I hope that it leads some guzzler drivers to upgrade into hybrid vehicles, although I doubt many will take such action.
What I find more interesting, however, is how easy Congress made it for guzzler drivers to upgrade into a new guzzler, yet how consumer unfriendly hybrid tax credits have been.
Trade in your old SUV or truck for one that achieves just 2 mpg better fuel economy and the government hands out a $3500 voucher? Wow. But buy a hybrid and your possible tax credit is dependent upon our crazy tax code?
Hopefully, Congress will reconsider the current tax credit for plug-in hybrids and EVs and make it as consumer friendly as it's doing with the guzzler program.
The new Toyota Prius has barely been on sale for a month in Japan, and already 180,000 orders have been placed for the hot new hybrid - more than Toyota was hoping to sell in Japan for the year.
In the States, the Prius is slowly starting to hit some dealers, but the supply of the new Prius is extremely low. So, if you're in the market, be prepared for a long wait.
